Skip to main content
· 3/13/1968

United States v. Brendan J. Hagarty

Citations

  • 388 F.2d 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • eavesdropping of public employee's office not \made in an effort to supervise and investigate * * * but was designed to detect criminal activity * * *.\
  • eavesdropping of public employee’s office not “made in an effort to supervise and investigate * * * but was designed to detect criminal activity * * *.”
  • court noted that eavesdropping was designed to detect criminal activity and on that basis distinguished cases upholding employer workplace searches
  • court noted that eavesdropping was designed to detect criminal activity and on that basis distinguished cases upholding employer workplace searches
  • whether purpose of search is for criminal investigation or administrative purpose is relevant to scope of fourth amendment protection
  • whether purpose of search is for criminal investigation or administrative purpose is relevant to scope of fourth amendment protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Kiley, Cummings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.