· 3/13/1968
United States v. Brendan J. Hagarty
Citations
- 388 F.2d 713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- eavesdropping of public employee's office not \made in an effort to supervise and investigate * * * but was designed to detect criminal activity * * *.\
- eavesdropping of public employee’s office not “made in an effort to supervise and investigate * * * but was designed to detect criminal activity * * *.”
- court noted that eavesdropping was designed to detect criminal activity and on that basis distinguished cases upholding employer workplace searches
- court noted that eavesdropping was designed to detect criminal activity and on that basis distinguished cases upholding employer workplace searches
- whether purpose of search is for criminal investigation or administrative purpose is relevant to scope of fourth amendment protection
- whether purpose of search is for criminal investigation or administrative purpose is relevant to scope of fourth amendment protection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Kiley, Cummings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.