United States v. Brave

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that written special condition, to the extent it is broader than the oral pronouncement, is void because “oral pronouncement by the sentencing court is the judgment of the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Otis Mays, Jr.
  Eighth Circuit· 2021-04-06· cited 37×
• United States v. Christopher Harris
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-07-21· cited 30×
• United States v. Edwin James
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-07-07· cited 26×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. John Robert Andis
  Eighth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 1,174×
• United States v. Love
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-01-22· cited 76×
• United States v. Durham
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-08-26· cited 70×
• United States v. John Scott
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-10-24· cited 66×
• United States v. Daniel Ignatz Tramp, Also Known as Dan Dailey
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-08-01· cited 46×
• Harry Lee Johnson v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1979-07-18· cited 40×
• United States v. Hilda Cervantes
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-08-24· cited 7×