Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/30/1996
United States v. Bramer
Citations
- 45 M.J. 296
- 1996 CAAF LEXIS 107
- 1996 WL 790788
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Article 14(b), UCMJ, inapplicable where the civil confinement is imposed prior to a court- martial sentence
- recognizing there are several exceptions to the rule that court-martial. sentences run from the date adjudged stemming from com-mop sense, Supreme Court Habeas Corpus writs, and Air Force regulations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Crawford, Flaum, Gierke, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fisher v. Commander, Army Regional Confinement FacilityNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2001-12-17· cited 6×
- United States v. WillenbringArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2001-12-12· cited 3×
- United States v. MooneyAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-03-21· cited 2×
- United States v. MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-03-12
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Noyd v. BondSupreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 231×
- United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1961-01-27· cited 10×
- United States v. EllensonU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1984-11-01· cited 4×
- United States v. BramerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1995-04-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.