Skip to main content
· 9/24/1997

United States v. Bradley Oliver Bowen, United States v. Rinaldo Ticchiarelli, A/K/A Ronaldo, A/K/A Whitney Dorey

Citations

  • 127 F.3d 9
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26476
  • 1997 WL 577662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a statute is obscure where genuine and insurmountable doubt exists as to its intended meaning
  • explaining that courts 15 have federal question jurisdiction in declaratory relief actions when “the declaratory judgment 16 defendant could have brought a coercive action in federal court to enforce its rights”
  • applying rule of lenity when experts offered conflicting definitions of “hashish oil” and district court found “no scientific or universally accepted precise definition of the term”
  • “A person may seek declaratory relief in federal court if the one 15 against whom he brings his action could have asserted his own rights there.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.