Skip to main content
· 5/27/1980

United States v. Bradford Burt, United States of America v. William L. Dennis, United States of America v. Roy Dean Snarr and James F. Rounsavall

Citations

  • 619 F.2d 831
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the presumption of vindictiveness can be rebutted where the prosecutor can show that his actions were “‘justified by independent reasons or intervening circumstances which dispel the appearance of vindictiveness’” (citation omitted)
  • “In most cases, [vindictive prosecu- tion] involves a showing that the prosecutor has re-indicted the defendant and increased the severity of the charge, after the defendant has exercised a statutory or constitutional right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Anderson, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.