Skip to main content
· 3/3/2026

United States v. Brad Wendt

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ORS 105.688(1)(c) (2021) “is relevant only where a plain- tiff is injured on land adjacent to the land that the person 104 Laxer v. City of Portland intends to use for recreational purposes” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.