Ninth Circuit· 8/17/2006
United States v. Brad Wayne Young
Citations
- 458 F.3d 998
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21060
- 2006 WL 2371887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the defendant had an opportunity to participate in a hearing because “the defendant could have objected to the entry of the order or otherwise engaged with the court as to the merits of the restraining order”
- “Joining the Fifth and Seventh Circuits, we agree that the plain text of the statute indicates that the ‘opportunity to participate’ requirement is a minimal one.”
- “[Section 922(g)(8)(A) requires] a proceeding during which the defendant could have objected to the entry of the order or otherwise engaged with the court as to the merits of the restraining order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Silverman, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-10-20· cited 213×
- United States v. ReeseTenth Circuit· 2010-12-10· cited 181×
- United States v. Jeffrey BoydThird Circuit· 2021-05-28· cited 33×
- United States v. KaspereitTenth Circuit· 2021-04-20· cited 32×
- United States v. WescottSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-03· cited 31×
- United States v. DuBoseEleventh Circuit· 2010-03-01· cited 29×
- Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhFifth Circuit· 2020-11-23· cited 28×
- United States v. Raymond Fryberg, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2017-04-21· cited 19×
- United States v. Junior Roldan MarinEighth Circuit· 2022-04-20· cited 13×
- Ewing v. Maine District CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-02-17· cited 10×
- United States v. BramerSecond Circuit· 2020-04-16· cited 10×
- State v. TelfordNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-06-15· cited 7×
- United States v. David WescottSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-03
- Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhFifth Circuit· 2020-11-24
- Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhFifth Circuit· 2020-12-01
- United States v. CampbellNinth Circuit· 2007-01-31
- United States v. BhatiaNinth Circuit· 2007-12-14
- United States v. TiradoNinth Circuit· 2008-07-23
- United States v. LarsonW.D. Virginia· 2012-02-16
- United States v. VandykeNinth Circuit· 2025-10-27
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
- Miller v. GammieNinth Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 1,582×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 924×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 742×
- United States v. Michael JohnsonNinth Circuit· 2001-07-20· cited 403×
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court· 1949-06-13· cited 272×
- United States v. EmersonFifth Circuit· 2001-11-02· cited 247×
- United States v. FregaNinth Circuit· 1999-06-08· cited 204×
- United States v. Richard HicksFifth Circuit· 2004-12-07· cited 197×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry John TISOR, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-09-06· cited 128×
- United States v. Terrill DixonNinth Circuit· 2000-01-21· cited 126×
- United States v. Carlton E. WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1998-11-16· cited 120×
- United States v. Michael Charles JonesNinth Circuit· 2000-11-02· cited 119×
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsNinth Circuit· 2004-05-06· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.