Skip to main content
· 3/12/2009

United States v. Bp Products North America Inc.

Citations

  • 610 F. Supp. 2d 655
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19472
  • 2009 WL 677653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This court disagrees that applying Fountain results in a categorical bar to basing restitution or a fine on future losses resulting from an offense.”
  • \This court disagrees that applying Fountain results in a categorical bar to basing restitution or a fine on future losses resulting from an offense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee H. Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.