Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 5/22/2017

United States v. Boyce

Citations

76 M.J. 242
2017 CAAF LEXIS 494
2017 WL 2267276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that no showing of knowledge or intent is required to demonstrate an appearance of unlawful command influence
reasoning that “unlike actual unlawful command influence where prejudice to the accused is required, no such showing is required for a meritorious claim of an appearance of unlaw- ful command influence” (footnote omitted)
“[I]n the military justice system, both the right to a trial that is fair, and the right to a trial that is objectively seen to be fair, have constitutional dimensions sounding in due process.” (citations omitted)
“This Court unequivocally endorses the [United States] Supreme Court’s observation that ‘[f]ederal courts have an independent interest in ensuring that . . . legal proceedings appear fair to all who observe them.’” (alteration and omission in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ohlson, Erdmann, Sparks, Stucky, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Boyce

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.