United States v. Bowdoin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The lineage of the term [investment contract] is too long and well-recognized for Mr. Bowdoin’s 2011 claim of unconstitutional vagueness to stand.”
• “A motion to dismiss an indictment challenges the adequacy of an Indictment on its face. Thus, the indictment must be viewed as a whole and the allegations must be accepted as true at this stage of the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).