United States v. Bova

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting the cross-reference is even better suited in “the case of perjury in a criminal trial to inculpate an innocent third party rather than to exculpate a confederate”
• “[W]e think it well to lay to rest any suggestion that Bova had a right to represent himself and to enjoy the benefit of standby appointed counsel.” (citing McKaskle, 465 U.S. at 183)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).