United States v. Boulden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to recognize a separate cause of action for negligent misrepresentation in the absence of an affirmative Virginia Supreme Court decision recognizing such an action
• holding in Sensenbremer “squarely on point” in EIFS case
• involving EIFS/synthetic stucco that failed to prevent water intrusion into walls
• “The Virginia Supreme Court has not . . . recognized a separate and independent cause of action for negligent misrepresentation and this Court declines to do so in this case.”
• Beard “expressly limited its discussion to breach of warranty claims for consequential economic loss damages, stating, ‘we assume that the Court of Appeals concluded that the economic loss damages claimed by Beard were consequential damages rather than direct damages’.”
• remote manufacturer cannot be liable for a Building Code violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).