United States v. Borrero-Acevedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that invalid reasons for an ALJ’s credibility assessment 12 are harmless error where the ALJ otherwise relies on valid reasons
• holding that “[m]edical opinions that predate the 17 alleged onset of disability are of limited relevance.”
• recognizing that a favorable response to treatment can 16 undermine a claimant’s complaints of debilitating pain or other severe limitations
• holding that “incongruity” between a doctor’s opinion and his 15 own medical records is a specific and legitimate reason for rejecting that opinion
• recognizing that a favorable response to treatment can 18 undermine a claimant’s complaints of debilitating pain or other severe limitations
• recognizing that a favorable response to treatment can 15 undermine a claimant’s complaints of debilitating pain or other severe limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).