Skip to main content
· 12/9/1955

United States v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.

Citations

  • 141 F. Supp. 396
  • 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2175
  • 1956 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that because implied indemnification is equitable in nature, it is generally unavailable to malfeasants
  • \Under the doctrine of respondeat superior the fault of the employee is imputed to the employer without requiring fault or knowledge on the part of the employer.\
  • “The classic example of implied indemnity is that which exists between an employer who has been held vicariously liable for the torts of its employee and the employee.”
  • because indemnity claims considered contractual, statute of limitations on unwritten contracts applies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.