United States v. Booker Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s decision to enhance defendant’s sentence under Guideline § 2A3.5(b)(1)(A
• “Whether the exception applies AC-2022-0102 23 depends on the underlying facts and circumstances […]”
• “We conclude that the threshold definition of ‘sex offense’ found in § 16911(5)(A)(i) requires a categorical approach—an inquiry limited to the elements of the offense—but the excep‐ tion in subsection (5)(C
• “Based on the statutory language, it’s clear that a categorical approach applies to the threshold definition of the term ‘sex offense’ in [34 U.S.C. § 20911] (5)(A)(i); the use of the word ‘element’ suggests as much.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).