Skip to main content
· 5/19/1965

United States v. Bomano

Citations

  • 241 F. Supp. 933
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding common questions of law and fact where plaintiffs all alleged that 21 defendant engaged in a particular kind of misrepresentation
  • finding common questions of law and fact where plaintiffs all alleged that 21 defendant engaged in a particular kind of misrepresentation
  • “To determine whether to consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation” (simplified)
  • “To determine whether to consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation.”
  • “To determine whether to 11 consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for 12 delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gignoux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.