· 5/19/1965
United States v. Bomano
Citations
- 241 F. Supp. 933
- 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9380
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding common questions of law and fact where plaintiffs all alleged that 21 defendant engaged in a particular kind of misrepresentation
- finding common questions of law and fact where plaintiffs all alleged that 21 defendant engaged in a particular kind of misrepresentation
- “To determine whether to consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation” (simplified)
- “To determine whether to consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation.”
- “To determine whether to 11 consolidate, a court weighs the interest of judicial convenience against the potential for 12 delay, confusion, and prejudice caused by consolidation” (internal quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gignoux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.