United States v. Bodye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that “the court is required to evaluate consent based on the totality of the circumstances”
• “[I]mplied consent may satisfy the consent exception to the warrant requirement. Therefore actual consent is not required.”
• “[I]mplied consent may satisfy the consent 4 exception to the warrant requirement. Therefore actual consent is not required.”
• “Under Idaho law, a driver’s implied consent continues if it is not revoked before the time of evidentiary testing.”
• “Where . . . a suspect is presented with a consent form for a blood draw, he or she is faced with two options: (1) sign the form and give actual consent for the blood draw, or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).