United States v. Bobby Webb (01-5682) and Preston Webb (01-5683)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proposition that this Court has never explicitly held that prior district court’s application of the guidelines to the facts offenses must be formally consolidated in order that they may should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous
• noting that the de novo review standard for the application of the acceptance of responsibility adjustment to uncontested facts used in United States v. Jeter, 191 F.3d 637, 638 (6th Cir. 1999) was no longer valid in light of Buford v. United States, 532 U.S. 59 (2001)
• internal quotation marks and citation decreased the penalty for the theft of government property omitted
• “this court has held that our standard of review of a district court's application of provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts should be treated deferentially and should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.”
• “[T]his court has held that our standard of review of a district court’s application of provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts should be treated deferentially and should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).