Skip to main content
· 4/27/1998

United States v. Blotcher

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 728
  • 1998 WL 199719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
  • holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
  • holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
  • holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
  • “The district court’s determination of whether the proffered explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge is pretextual and whether there has been purposeful racial discrimination largely turn[s] on credibility” and is therefore owed “great deference”
  • “The district court’s determination of whether the proffered explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge is pretextual and whether there has been purposeful racial discrimination largely turn[s] on credibility” and is therefore owed “great deference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Phillips, Widener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.