· 4/27/1998
United States v. Blotcher
Citations
- 142 F.3d 728
- 1998 WL 199719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
- holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
- holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
- holding that we grant deference to the trial judge’s “credibility determinations” at step three
- “The district court’s determination of whether the proffered explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge is pretextual and whether there has been purposeful racial discrimination largely turn[s] on credibility” and is therefore owed “great deference”
- “The district court’s determination of whether the proffered explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge is pretextual and whether there has been purposeful racial discrimination largely turn[s] on credibility” and is therefore owed “great deference”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murnaghan, Phillips, Widener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.