Second Circuit· 8/6/1998
United States v. Bleznak
Citations
- 153 F.3d 16
- 1998 WL 455598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying as moot a motion to take judicial notice of facts “not relevant to our disposition of this appeal”
- declining to take judicial notice of matters “not relevant to our disposition of this appeal”
- “Because these [facts] are not relevant to our disposition of this appeal, we deny the [judicial notice] motion as moot.”
- “A trial court ‘is not compelled to exclude [an] expert just 20 because the testimony may, to a greater or lesser degree, cover matters that are within the 21 average juror’s comprehension.’”
- ‘In connection with this issue, appellants have filed a motion asking us to take judicial notice of several court filings cited in their brief. Because these filings are not relevant to our disposition of this appeal, we deny the motion as moot.”
- declining to address merits of investigatory or other privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leval, Trager, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationS.D. New York· 1998-11-09· cited 96×
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.D. Kansas· 2000-04-18· cited 81×
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasS.D. New York· 2003-07-30· cited 33×
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lek Sec. Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2019-03-14· cited 7×
- United States v. BleznakFirst Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 5×
- Gary K. Bielfeldt and Carlotta J. Bielfeldt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 2000-11-08· cited 4×
- United States v. StanleyS.D. New York· 2012-08-07· cited 2×
- Bielfeldt, Gary K. v. CIRSeventh Circuit· 2000-11-08
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re LTV Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 1981-03-23· cited 116×
- Olympic Refining Co. v. CarterNinth Circuit· 1964-05-19· cited 53×
- People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District No. 205, and Rockford Education Association, Intervenors-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1992-04-22· cited 52×
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar AssociationD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-15· cited 32×
- Perkins v. City of Chicago HeightsSeventh Circuit· 1995-02-07· cited 32×
- United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-11-26· cited 14×
- United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-04-23· cited 13×
- United States v. Central Contracting Co., Inc.E.D. Virginia· 1982-04-06· cited 5×
Other cases named United States v. Bleznak
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.