United States v. Bleznak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying as moot a motion to take judicial notice of facts “not relevant to our disposition of this appeal”
• declining to take judicial notice of matters “not relevant to our disposition of this appeal”
• “Because these [facts] are not relevant to our disposition of this appeal, we deny the [judicial notice] motion as moot.”
• “A trial court ‘is not compelled to exclude [an] expert just 20 because the testimony may, to a greater or lesser degree, cover matters that are within the 21 average juror’s comprehension.’”
• ‘In connection with this issue, appellants have filed a motion asking us to take judicial notice of several court filings cited in their brief. Because these filings are not relevant to our disposition of this appeal, we deny the motion as moot.”
• declining to address merits of investigatory or other privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Bleznak

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Bleznak
  First Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 5×