United States v. Blackstock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pre- Castro motion did not count as a first § 2255 motion because the litigant did not receive the required notice and warning
• explaining that the district court must advise inmates of the consequences of filing a § 2255 motion before converting a mislabeled post-conviction motion into a motion pursuant to § 2255
• explaining that the district court must advise inmates of the consequences of filing a § 2255 motion prior to converting a mislabeled post-conviction motion into a motion pursuant to § 2255
• remanding to district court pursuant to Hill for determination of timeliness of § 2255 Motion
• remanding to district court pursuant to Hill for determination of timeliness of § 2255 Motion
• remanding to district court pursuant to Hill for determination of timeliness of § 2255 Motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).