United States v. Blackeagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was bad faith to seek to amend complaint in order to “artificially inflate ... damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”
• holding that it was bad faith to seek to amend complaint to “artificially inflate . . . damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”
• holding that it was bad faith to seek to amend complaint in order to “artificially inflate . . . damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”
• finding that a party acted in bad faith by seeking leave to amend “to artificially inflate his damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”
• finding that a party acted in bad faith by seeking leave to amend “to artificially inflate his damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”
• finding amended was sought in bad faith when the plaintiff “merely sought to artificially inflate his damages in order to obtain subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).