· 7/8/2005
United States v. Bisanti
Citations
- 414 F.3d 168
- 67 Fed. R. Serv. 809
- 96 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5092
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13575
- 2005 WL 1594658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[f]actual determinations are reviewed for clear error, legal determinations are reviewed de novo, and evidentiary determinations are reviewed for abuse of discretion”
- concludmg that “[fjactual determinations are reviewed for clear error, legal determinations are reviewed de -novo, and evidentiary determinations are reviewed for abuse of discretion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Lynch, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.