Skip to main content
· 7/8/2005

United States v. Bisanti

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 168
  • 67 Fed. R. Serv. 809
  • 96 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5092
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13575
  • 2005 WL 1594658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[f]actual determinations are reviewed for clear error, legal determinations are reviewed de novo, and evidentiary determinations are reviewed for abuse of discretion”
  • concludmg that “[fjactual determinations are reviewed for clear error, legal determinations are reviewed de -novo, and evidentiary determinations are reviewed for abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Lynch, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.