United States v. Binkley (In Re Binkley)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] fraudulent return does not preclude dischargeability as to a spouse who is not shown to have been guilty of complicity or otherwise personally involved in the fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).