Skip to main content
· 1/13/1983

United States v. Billy Ng, Tak Man Yee & Oswald K. Liew

Citations

  • 699 F.2d 63
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A setting that involves the conduct of two independent sovereigns does not lend itself to the concept of vindictive prosecution”
  • “Although one may reasonably disagree with the [government’s] judgment in the matter, the evaluation of charges clearly rested within [its] prosecutorial discretion.”
  • “[T]he fact that the prosecutions of the defendants are by two different sovereigns, each acting independently under its own laws and in its own interest without any control of or by the other, renders inapplicable the concept of prosecutorial vindictiveness.”
  • application of “Petite Policy” for dual or successive federal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Mansfield, Kearse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.