United States v. Billy K. Hargis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in Section 7 case, holding the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden 24 because “of their failure adequately to define and to prove the relevant market, which is a 25 necessary predicate for evaluating claims under these provisions of the antitrust laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).