United States v. Billy G. Samples

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the district judge did not selectively send only prejudicial evidence to the jury room [because] [a]ll exhibits, the govern- ment’s and the defendant’s, were given to the jury”
• no due process violation where defendant challenged twenty-month delay between dismis- sal of first indictment and re-indictment
• failure to raise a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(d)(1); waives claim
• while the language of Speedy Trial Act is ambiguous as to whether the original arrest or an arrest made in connection with the subsequent indictment controlled, the legislative history of the act makes reference to allowing the time limits imposed in subsections 3161(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).