United States v. Bill Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proposed testing must be capable of showing a probability of guilt “so low that actual innocence would be the only sensible explanation”
• even where defendant was identified by an eyewitness, “touch DNA could . . . be persuasive evidence” of defendant’s innocence where it might indicate that someone other than the defendant pulled the clothing off of rape victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Tiger
  New York Court of Appeals· 2018-06-14· cited 28×
• Garding v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 2020-06-23· cited 14×
• State v. GATES (And Vice Versa)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-03-13· cited 9×
• Sartain v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 2017-09-05· cited 7×
• Meinhard v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2016-03-23· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
  Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
• Longview Fibre Co. v. Rasmussen
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 120×
• United States v. Youssef
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-11-05· cited 26×
• United States v. Fasano
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-08-04· cited 20×
• United States v. Jordan
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-02-11· cited 14×
• United States v. Pitera
  Second Circuit· 2012-04-03· cited 7×