United States v. Bilis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error in an instruction that omitted the word “recklessness”
• stating § 856(a)(2) requires the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt “(1) that [the defendant] managed or controlled [the place at issue]; (2) that [the defendant] knowingly and in- tentionally made [the place] available for use to others; and (3
• “The fact that the government also offered evidence to support the theory that [defendant] possessed direct knowledge ... did not render the willful blindness instruction inappropriate.”
• \The fact that the government also offered evidence to support the theory that [defendant] possessed direct knowledge. . . did not render the willful blindness instruction inappropriate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).