Skip to main content
· 3/9/1953

United States v. Bigger

Citations

  • 2 C.M.A. 297
  • 2 USCMA 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • husband not guilty of forgery, nor may copayee wife invoke protections of Check Forgery Insurance Fund, 31 U.S.C. §§ 561-64, where husband forged wife’s signature on joint income tax return check, in absence of proof that wife had superior possessory interest in proceeds of the check

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosman, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.