United States v. Bienvenido Mejia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the proper practice for a jury inquiry and response thereto is as follows: (1) the jury inquiry should be in writing; (2) the note should be marked as the court’s exhibit and read into the record with counsel and defendant present; (3
• “[W]e [have] emphasized the importance of the input of counsel in a court’s response to jury messages.”
• court received note expressing deadlock and revealing vote count; court responded that jury should not reveal vote count, but did not provide further instruction
• “[T]he proper practice for a jury inquiry and response thereto is as follows: (1) the jury inquiry should be in writing; (2) the note should be marked as the court’s exhibit and read into the record with counsel and defendant present; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).