United States v. Bertha Craig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “failure to ask questions that would certainly arise from the circumstances ... is evidence that could lead a jury to determine” that the defendant deliberately avoided learning the truth
• holding that defendant’s \failure to ask questions that would certainly arise from the circumstances . . . is evidence that could lead a jury to determine\ that the defendant deliberately avoided learning the truth
• affirming obstruction enhancement where defendant falsely denied recruiting fictitious students in large scam because denial was material \to the question of her guilt\
• applying the ostrich inference to another federal-grant fraud prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).