United States v. Bernardino Ribota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a change in prosecutors diminishes the “personal stake” at the core of a vindictive prosecution claim
• standing alone, prosecutor’s decision to seek additional charges after the court granted a motion to suppress evidence did not indicate prosecutorial vindictiveness
• discussing substitution of charges in response to a “materially altered evidentiary landscape”
• “[T]he spectre of vindictiveness is lack- ing where the challenged charge is independent of the one that formed the basis of the exercise of the legal right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).