United States v. Bernard Whittington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that drug trafficking “is generally a cash business,” and “cellular phones are commonly associated with drug trafficking.”
• noting that “the relevance threshold is very low under Rule 401”
• finding two witnesses' \testimony alone . . . sufficient to sustain the jury verdict\
• finding two witnesses’ “testimony alone ... sufficient to sustain the jury verdict”
• explaining that “[t]he standard for relevancy is extremely liberal”
• finding two witnesses’ “testimony alone . . . sufficient to sustain the jury verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).