United States v. Bernard v. Nardi, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the doctrine applies “only when inadmissible evidence has been allowed, when that evidence was prejudicial, and when the proffered testimony would counter that prejudice”
• stating that the doctrine applies 9 “only when inadmissible evidence has been allowed, when that evidence was 10 prejudicial, and when the proffered testimony would counter that prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).