· 10/26/1981
United States v. Bernard J. Coven and James F. O'COnnOr
Citations
- 662 F.2d 162
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mere prosecutorial comment on defendant’s failure to refute the government’s evidence or support his or her own claims is not constitutionally invalid
- fact that allegedly prejudicial information is learned in a judicial rather than a personal capacity is “relevant” to the analysis of the appearance of impropriety
- individual has no expectation of privacy in documents given to or accessible by undercover informant
- individual has no expectation of privacy in documents given to or acces- sible by undercover informant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oakes, Meskill, Blumenfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.