United States v. Bernard Henry, Also Known as Ozzie Stealson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the lower court’s finding “that a jury would not readily identify [the defendant’s jail-issued] denim as prison issue”
• “We likewise defer to the [trial] court’s finding that a jury would not readily identify Henry’s MCC denim as prison issue.”
• “We likewise defer to the [trial] court’s finding that a jury would not readily identify Henry’s MCC denim as prison issue.”
• “We see no compulsion, as the court did not affirmatively prevent Henry from wearing civilian clothing, but simply refused to excuse Henry’s failure to make proper arrangements despite receiving ample notice and opportunity.”
• cert. denied 515 U.S. 1110 (1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).