United States v. Bennie Richardson, IV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the statutory language ‘including by computer’ does not require computer use to violate [18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a
• noting that “the statutory language ‘including by computer’ does not require computer use to violate [18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a
• upholding a distribution conviction where a law enforcement officer downloaded a child pornography video stored in the defendant’s shared folder
• upholding a distribution conviction where a law enforcement officer “actually downloaded” a child pornography video stored in the defendant’s shared folder
• defendant was a computer technician and admitted that he knew his shared folder was available to others
• “Under the Guidelines, making the images available to others constitutes distribution . . . .” (quoting United States v. Powers, 379 F. App’x 347, 348 (5th Cir. 2010) (unpublished opinion)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).