United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we must view our decisions in light of intervening Supreme Court decisions closely on point
• affirming a reckless indifference instruction in a mail fraud case on the grounds that it conforms with a long line of Ninth Circuit precedent
• holding a “three-judge panel . . . cannot reconsider or overrule the decision of a prior panel” unless “an intervening Supreme Court decision undermines an existing precedent of the Ninth Circuit, and both cases are closely on point” (internal quotations and citation omitted)
• \[O]ne three-Judge panel of this court cannot reconsider or overrule the decision of a prior panel.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).