Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/8/2024

United States v. Benjamin

Citations

  • 95 F.4th 60

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases holding that a quid pro quo can be implied
  • joining “[e]very other circuit to have considered th[e] question” to hold that the “explicit quid pro quo requirement may be met by implication from the official’s and the payor’s words and actions and need not entail an express statement”
  • “[T]he McCormick explicit quid pro quo requirement may be met by implication from the official’s and the payor’s words and actions and need not entail an express statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.