United States v. Bender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to the extent that Rule 16 does not express a policy prohibiting dis-covezy not explicitly authorized by the Rules, the court is free, either by local mle or by adjudication, to pezmit discovezy on the basis of its inherent power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Beckford
  E.D. Virginia· 1997-03-28· cited 39×
• United States v. Kloepper
  D. Massachusetts· 1989-11-07· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1963-09-26· cited 125×
• Huerta v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 74×
• Bratcher v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 1945-05-09· cited 49×
• United States v. Taylor
  E.D. New York· 1960-04-25· cited 21×
• Lanier Allison Ramer v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-06-05· cited 11×
• United States of America Ex Rel. John Ramos v. Warren Pinto, Warden
  Third Circuit· 1970-05-15· cited 2×