United States v. Ben McMeans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant \can not now approach the court and complain of the result of his decision\
• adopting the Ninth Circuit’s standard in Martinez, discussed below, and holding that “[t]o waive the right, all the defendant needs to know is that a right to testify exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).