United States v. Bedolla-Zavala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that the defendant’s use of an alias was not “material” because it “‘actually had no effect’ on the ‘case or its outcome’”
• “The relevant considerations are the kind of information provided and its tendency to influence the court, not the actual effect of a particular misstatement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).