N.D. Georgia· 9/29/1965
United States v. Beckley
Citations
- 259 F. Supp. 567
- 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not necessary that there be false representation or promise; all that is necessary is a scheme calculated to deceive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Joseph CovelloSecond Circuit· 1969-03-24· cited 111×
- United States v. Michael William CleggFifth Circuit· 1975-03-05· cited 95×
- Francesco G. Campiti v. Michael A. WalonisFirst Circuit· 1979-12-18· cited 74×
- James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign CorporationNinth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 61×
- Oliver Wendell Henderson and Leon Edward Jurras v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1970-04-21· cited 52×
- United States v. Patrick Joseph SavageFifth Circuit· 1977-12-15· cited 45×
- United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsNinth Circuit· 1976-03-25· cited 40×
- Herman D. Brandon v. United States of America, Sylvester E. Gautreaux, Jr. v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1967-08-29· cited 35×
- United States v. Melvin L. FreemanSeventh Circuit· 1975-10-20· cited 25×
- United States v. James A. Harvey, A/K/A Ray Stewart, A/K/A Joseph R. StewartEighth Circuit· 1976-08-24· cited 25×
- Sistok v. Northwestern Telephone Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1980-07-22· cited 24×
- Kenneth Herbert Hanna and Nathan Modell v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-04-17· cited 15×
- United States v. DeLeeuwE.D. Wisconsin· 1974-01-07· cited 15×
- United States v. HannaS.D. Florida· 1966-09-26· cited 14×
- United States v. ShahW.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-03-01· cited 11×
- Charles Dee Scott, Doyle Monroe Cross v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1971-10-12· cited 6×
- United States v. FreemanS.D. Indiana· 1974-03-29· cited 6×
- Arrington v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1972-10-24· cited 4×
- People v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-04-29· cited 4×
- United States v. JaworskiD. Minnesota· 1972-05-31· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Shushan v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1941-01-18· cited 180×
- Wayne Rosser Abbott v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1956-12-19· cited 58×
- Alton T. Milam, Burr F. Sprague and Robert B. Kimball v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-10-14· cited 49×
- Jerome D. Linden, Robert R. Baylis, Classified Business Directory, Inc., and Directory Listings, Inc. v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1958-04-09· cited 48×
- Silverman v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1954-06-09· cited 47×
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 43×
- United States v. Charles v. GrisSecond Circuit· 1957-08-16· cited 42×
- Robert Frederick Huff and William Constantine Nicholson v. United States or AmericaFifth Circuit· 1962-07-23· cited 39×
- United States v. GalloSecond Circuit· 1941-11-10· cited 36×
- United States v. Robert v. H. Sugden and Jean S. SugdenNinth Circuit· 1955-11-10· cited 35×
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.D. Massachusetts· 1942-11-09· cited 31×
- Casey v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1951-12-03· cited 15×
Other cases named United States v. Beckley
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. BeckleyE.D. Michigan· 2010-03-06· cited 2×
- United States v. BeckleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-05-18· cited 2×
- United States v. BeckleyEleventh Circuit· 1996-10-16
- United States v. BeckleyDistrict of Columbia· 2023-07-14
- United States v. BeckleyDistrict of Columbia· 2024-01-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.