Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 10/31/2014

United States v. Bear

Citations

  • 769 F.3d 1221
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20845
  • 2014 WL 5487731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that commission of a sex crime is “generally” enough to “require an initial mental health assessment and treatment consistent with that assessment”
  • explaining that “§ 3583(d)(3) mandates only that the conditions not directly conflict with the policy statements”
  • interpreting a condition not to delegate authority to impose invasive medical and psychiatric treatments because such a condition would implicate liberty interests
  • stating that inpatient treatment affects a significant liberty interest
  • vacating conditions limiting Bear’s ability to reside with his children because, despite his prior sex offenses, the record did not show “a danger to his own three children”
  • interpreting ambiguous supervised-release condition so as to not impose invasive medical and psychiatric treatments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Phillips, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Bear

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.