· 7/2/2007
United States v. BDO Seidman, LLP
Citations
- 492 F.3d 806
- 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5052
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15796
- 2007 WL 1880208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \stating that the common interest doctrine only will apply where the parties undertake a joint effort with respect to a common legal interest\
- “Only those communications which ‘reflect the lawyer's thinking [or] are made for the purpose of eliciting the lawyer's professional advice or other legal assistance’ fall within the privilege.”
- whether to extend to potential litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.