Skip to main content
· 7/2/2007

United States v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Citations

  • 492 F.3d 806
  • 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5052
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15796
  • 2007 WL 1880208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \stating that the common interest doctrine only will apply where the parties undertake a joint effort with respect to a common legal interest\
  • “Only those communications which ‘reflect the lawyer's thinking [or] are made for the purpose of eliciting the lawyer's professional advice or other legal assistance’ fall within the privilege.”
  • whether to extend to potential litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.