United States v. Bazezew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the indictment “charges that while the conspiracy began on September 3, 2009, none of the 16 remaining defendants [who had not pled guilty] took an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy until [at least eight days later]’’
• granting motion for bill of particulars listing, among other things, unindicted co-conspirators due to lack of helpful detail in indictment as to co-conspirator’s alleged actions
• granting in part a bill of particulars to require the government to disclose the identities of sixteen alleged co-conspirators
• emphasizing gaps between overt acts of co-conspirators, and how defendants would consequently “not be able to adequately prepare for trial or avoid surprise at trial,” in granting motion for bill of particulars
• “the general rule is that the defendant is not entitled to obtain detailed information about the conspiracy in a bill of particulars”
• “A bill of particulars properly includes clarification of the indictment if necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).