United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., United States of America v. Baytank (Houston), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding invited error where the defendant “not only failed to object to the allegedly overbroad portion of the court’s charge, but that portion of the charge is the precise language requested by” the defendant
• “documents, including drum inventories, a hazardous waste log, and internal memoranda, as well as the testimony at trial, all amply demonstrate” that drums contained hazardous waste
• “Even if Baytank’s duplicity argument had merit, Baytank has waived it by failing to object below.”
• violations of storage rules subjected defendant to criminal liability
• invited error cannot be taken advantage of on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).