United States v. Bayshore Associates, Inc., a Michigan Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant must have notice of type of proceeding to which he is subject
• recognizing compensatory damages “payable to the complainant as compensation for damages caused by the contemnor’s noncompliance”
• treating order appealed as preliminary injunction where district court “inartfully” characterized order as permanent injunction
• “Compensatory contempt orders compensate the party harmed by the other party’s contemptuous actions; coercive orders seek to cajole the party in contempt to act in the manner desired by the court.”
• “Compensatory contempt orders compensate the party harmed by the other party’s contemptuous actions; coercive orders seek to cajole the party in contempt to act in the manner desired by the court.”
• “Incarceration has long been established as an appropriate sanction for civil contempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).