United States v. Baumert
Citations
- 179 F. 735
- 1910 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 294
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Daw (§ 211*) — Preliminary Warrant — Foundation.</p> <p>Under Const U. S. Amend. 4, providing that no warrant shall issue but on probable canse supported by oath or affirmation, a federal court has no jurisdiction to direct the issuance of a warrant on an information made on the information and belief of the United States district attorney alone; but it must be supported by proof establishing probable cause, to wit, legal evidence that a crime has been committed and that there is probable cause and belief that the accused is guilty of the commission thereof.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 420-430; Dec. Dig. § 211.*]</p> <p>2. Indictment and Information (§ 36*) — Statutes.</p> <p>Rev. St. § 1014 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 716), providing that for any crime or offense against the United States the offender may, by any judge or justice of the United States, or by any commissioner of a Circuit Court to take bail, or by any chancellor or judge of a Supreme or superior court, chief or first judge of common jileas, mayor or other magistrate of the state, where he may be found and agreeable to the usual mode of process against the offender of the state or the offender of the United States, be imprisoned or bailed as the case may be, and providing for the return of process for the recognizance of witnesses, etc., relates to preliminary examinations and has no application to prosecutions by information.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Indictment and Information, Dec. Dig. § 36.*]</p> <p>3. Indictment and Information (§ 9*) — Necessity of Complaint.</p> <p>An indictment may be found and presented by a grand jury without a preliminary formal complaint or prior arrest.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Indictment and Information, Dec. Dig. § 9.*]</p> <p>4. Indictment and Information (§ 3*) — Information by United States Attorney-Misdemeanors.</p> <p>A prosecution for an offense not punishable by imprisonment in
Judges: Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Giles v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1922-10-28· cited 104×
- Worthington v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1948-02-13· cited 85×
- Weeks v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1914-06-18· cited 63×
- People v. EffelbergMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-12-05· cited 23×
- United States v. DescyD. Rhode Island· 1922-11-17· cited 16×
- United States Ex Rel. King v. GokeyN.D. New York· 1929-05-21· cited 14×
- In re Rosenwasser Bros.E.D. New York· 1918-10-31· cited 9×
- United States v. KallasW.D. Washington· 1921-04-30· cited 9×
- United States v. LangsdaleW.D. Missouri· 1953-10-28· cited 7×
- United States v. WellsW.D. Tennessee· 1913-04-21· cited 7×
- United States v. KennedyD. Colorado· 1946-05-27· cited 4×
- United States v. American LaboratoriesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1915-04-27· cited 4×
- United States v. MichalskiW.D. Pennsylvania· 1919-11-15· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte BurfordSupreme Court· 1806-03-18· cited 108×
- United States v. TureaudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana· 1884-05-28· cited 43×
- Johnston v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1898-04-26· cited 21×
- People v. VasaloCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-02-24· cited 16×
- United States v. PoliteD. South Carolina· 1888-05-15· cited 10×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1890-02-28· cited 8×
- Ex parte BurfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia· 1805-12-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.